My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-10-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-10-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 3:40:09 PM
Creation date
10/9/2003 3:26:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
10/13/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
__ <br /> �O �+� <br /> 10% density bonus to residentia/ condominium projects <br /> that inc/ude at /east 20'/ of the units for moderate <br /> — income househo/ds. <br /> For example, a developer wishes to construct 40 condominiums on a one acre <br /> parcel. The developer could build an additiona/ 4 units (10% of the maximum <br /> allowable 40 uniUacre density) if he/she would dedicate 8(20% of the total) to <br /> moderate income hous�:holds. Moderate income households are those <br /> households earning 120% of the San Mateo County median income for a family <br /> of four or $109,800 per year. This translates into $2,470 affordable rent payment <br /> for a two bedroom unit. <br /> • Under the current regulations, the City has to make findings <br /> to approve density bonuses and/or density incentives. <br /> Under the new /aw, a City has to approve the density <br /> bonuses and/or density incentives un/ess it can make <br /> findings that the bonuses or incentives are not <br /> necessary to make the project financially feasib/e or that <br /> it will adverse/y afiect any historic resources. <br /> • Under the current law, the Citv must Qrant at least one of the <br /> following density incentives to affordable housing projects as <br /> long as the incentive is necessary to make the project <br /> financially feasible, and the City has the final authoritv in <br /> — deciding which density incentives to approve: <br /> a. Required off-street parking <br /> b. Required setbacks; <br /> c. Maximum building height <br /> d. Required open space <br /> e. Maximum floor-area ratio <br /> f. Minimum lot area <br /> Under the new /aw, the City must grant one of the above <br /> density incentives, in addition to the density bonus, of the <br /> applicant's choosin4 so /ong as it is necessary to make the <br /> project financially feasible. <br /> • Under the current law, when calculating a density bonus, all <br /> fractional remainders less than'/z are rounded down. Under <br /> the new law, all fractional remainders are rounded up. <br /> Based on development history, this law change will probably have little impact on <br /> Redwood City. A private developer has never formally requested a density <br /> bonus from the City under the provisions of State law. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.