Laserfiche WebLink
, , 393 <br /> in his allocation of eight units Mr. Yaeger noted that the City was <br /> commended for an overall 40% reduction in water use in July and August <br /> and suggested that the City could have allowed less than a 25� cutback <br /> for residences and still met the goal of a 25Y cutback Mr Yaeger <br /> aiso commented concerning average and median water use figures for <br /> � a fam�ly of four. <br /> Alice Gonzales, 616 Dory, stated that hers is a new residence with no <br /> history for 1976 Mrs Gonzales referred to her appeal letter with <br /> attachments of August 2 and called attention to the need for increased <br /> water allocation in order to maintain the landscaping she was required � <br /> to install at the time of purchasing her new home Mrs. Gonzales ad- <br /> vised that she had made a survey of water allotments granted to her <br /> neighbors and suggested that they receive greater water allocations. <br /> Mrs. Gonzales recommended that allocation be made on the basis of <br /> average use in particular neighborhoods and stated that the average <br /> allocation in Redwood Shores appears to be about 34 units, not�ng that <br /> the landscaping is new and requires a great deal of water. <br /> It was pointed out that it would be inappropriate to allocate water <br /> on the basis of average use in an area and that in older neighbor- <br /> hoods where the more mature landscaping is more valuable, it is <br /> also suffering from the drought <br /> In response to question, Mr. Fales and Mr. Pusich advised that Mrs. <br /> Gonzales purchased her home and was required to install landscaping <br /> ,7ust before the water emergency ordinance went tnto effect, but that <br /> at present the landscaping requirement for new homes is be�ng waived <br /> during the emergency City Attorney Schricker advised that the ordi- <br /> nance mandates there shall be no allocation to new construction for <br /> � landscaping <br /> In response to question, Mr. Schricker advised that water customers <br /> do not have the option to use whatever water they wish and pay the <br /> penalty, but that if customers do not reduce use to required amounts, <br /> restrictors may be installed and, if necessary, cessation of service <br /> will occur <br /> MOTION Councilman Rhodes moved, seconded by Councilman Vega, to • <br /> increase the water allocation to Steve Yaeger, 3355 Dover Road, from ' <br /> 15 to 20 units per billing period in recognition of the needs of a <br /> new baby <br /> (Councilman Bury returned at 9 00 p m) <br /> In response to question, Mr. Pusich advised that a median allotment <br /> has been established for a family of four for new residences and that <br /> as the family numbers are greater, increments are added He noted <br /> that the �ncrements are less and less since water use does not in- <br /> crease proportionately with size of famiTy <br /> The motion failed on the following tie roll call vote <br /> Ayes Cou�cilmen Norris, Rhodes, Vega <br /> � Noes Councilmen Barrett, Biagi and Mayor Leipzig <br /> Abstained Councilman Bury <br /> -5- Reg Mtg. <br /> 9/12/77 <br />