Laserfiche WebLink
�� � <br /> , <br /> C�ty C72rk Hildebrand reported the Afftdavtt of Mailrng �s on fiie m <br /> her office. , , , <br /> City Manager Fales advised that the buildirrg to be moved is�a com- <br /> mercial one which will be moved in four sections and reconstructed <br /> at the Veterans Boulevard site in accordance with all other re- <br /> ' qu7rements for the property and development involved <br /> Planning Director Schroeter advised for the record that the Archi- <br /> ° tectural Comroittee has considered and approved the building and its <br /> location, landscaping, sign�ng and other requ�rements„for the,site. <br /> Vice Mayor Barrett invited anyone else who wished to speak to <br /> do so. No one else wished to speak <br /> ' MOTION Councilman Biag� moved, seconded by Councilman Bury, to close <br /> the public hearing. <br /> The motion carrzed�unan�mousiy by voice vote <br /> The'public hearing_closed et 8 20 p,m. �.� tu " '. � ''" ��`�� <br /> _ , <br /> MOTION Councilman Bury moved, seconded by Councilman Rhodes,�to <br /> authorize issuance of a permit to Citizens Sav�ngs and Loan to move <br /> a corrnnercial building to 975 Veterans Boulevard and that the finding <br /> is made that granting the permit will not be detrimental to the ., <br /> public welfare nor in�urious to property or„�mprovements: , � <br /> City Attorney Schricker advised that the photographs of the sub�ect <br /> building,provided to,Council should be made a part of the record.,� = <br /> ' The motion carried una m mously by voice vote " � �_� <br /> �.` ., (MINUTE ORDER NO,�_77_-25$) <br /> Public Hearinq - Appeal from the denial by the Director of Public <br /> . ' Works of°appl�cation for increased water allocation - <br /> " ' Richard E Freeman, 416 Lanvard Drive <br /> City Manager Fales referred to the file provided to Council on the <br /> sub,7ect appeal and to the report of the D�rector of Publ�c Wor,ks of <br /> November 15 transmitted to Council by the City Manager,'s �Report of, <br /> November 23, 1977. <br /> Richard E Freeman, 416 Lanyard Dr�ve, appellant, referred to his <br /> letter with attachments of October 27, 1977. Mr. Freeman advtsed <br /> that his family has recentiy �ncreased because of the birth of twins <br /> and described in detail all of his fam�ly's attempts to conserve <br /> water in order to remain within the City's water allocation �He , <br /> indicated he has concern for the sanitary cond�t�ons of his home and <br /> the health of his family because of some of the conservation measures <br /> �aken. <br /> In response to question, Mr Freeman acknow7edged that he has not <br /> yet used h1s full water allocation in any billing period, having <br /> ' used'oniy 21 units of the 28 allocated in the last billing period, , <br /> but stated he is concerned for his peace of mind,that he may not be <br /> able to remain within the allotment. <br /> ; 6 ' Reg Mtg <br /> '• 11/28/77 <br /> ' � , . , . <br />