Laserfiche WebLink
20 ' <br /> Discussion followed and Mr freeman and Mr Fales cortQnented and replied <br /> to questions concerning the desirability of maintaining proper health <br /> and sanitation conditions, the fact that figures presented by Mr. <br /> Freeman suggesting that larger amounts of water are allocated by_ _______ <br /> � nearby �urisdictions are from a city which has fallen far short of the ' <br /> 25� cutback required by the San Francisco Water District, the fact <br /> that Mr Freeman has not offered any evidence that he cannot meet <br /> reasonable health standards on the water presently allocated stnce <br /> , he is not using the full allocation, the fact that an increase was <br /> granted to Mr. Freeman in July in anticipation of the birth of twins, <br /> but that for the first billing period after the increase, his family <br /> used only 20 of the 33 units allowed, the fact that the remaining 13 <br /> unused units represents more water than is used by many families of <br /> four within the City; the fact that wh�le there is no desire to en- <br /> courage residents to use all of the water allocated to each dwelling, <br /> that neither are they encouraged to take health risks, and that the <br /> ` appeal procedure� exists so that water users who are exceedin9 their <br /> allocat�on for good cause may have their allocations reviewed <br /> MOTION: Counci7man Rhodes moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi, to <br /> deny the appeal of Richard E. Freeman, 416 lanyard Dr�ve, from the <br /> denial by the Director of Public Works of application for increased <br /> water allocation. <br /> � It was pointed out that if Mr. Freeman finds he cannot maintain his <br /> fam�ly in good health and sanitary conditions on the water allocated <br /> to his residence,that he may appeal any penalty and offer evidence <br /> regarding failure to remain within the allocation. <br /> The mot�on carried unanimously by voice vote. ' <br /> (MINUTE ORDER N0. 77-259) <br /> Proposed appropriation increase - <br /> Se m or Citizens Drop-in Genter <br /> � City Manager Fales reported that he had been requested by Sally Salinas, <br /> Director of the Center, to withdraw the sub�ect item. Mr. Fales noted <br /> that a grant application had been approved wh�ch w�ll prov7de the <br /> necessary funds. <br /> Request for additional Bu�lding Department personnet <br /> City Manager Fales referred to his report of November 23, 1977 regard- <br /> ing the sub�ect request and attaching report from the Building Official <br /> dated November 21. Mr Fales observed that anticipated cqnstruction <br /> �n the City has greatly increased necessitat�ng the add�tion of the <br /> proposed personnel, noting that funds expected to be received from <br /> permit and plan check fees and other sources related to the construc- <br /> tion would be more than adequate to cover personnel costs. <br /> M07ION Titles having been read, Councilman Norris introduced the <br /> following resolution and ord�nances and moved, seconded by Council- � <br /> man Biag�, adoption of the resqlution and approval for first reading <br /> of the ordinances: <br /> RFSOLUTION NO 7935 APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR POSITION OF <br /> PiAN CNECK ENGINEER (MECHANICAL) <br /> � <br /> ��ag. Mtg -7- <br /> ?1/28/77 � <br />