Laserfiche WebLink
( � <br /> � <br /> 3° �i <br /> noting that the City is more susceptible to certain types of lawsuit <br /> than a private homeowners association might be. <br /> In response to question, Mr Shea advised that the proposed develop- <br /> ment could not accommodate the conditions which staff recorrmiends if ' <br /> the streets must be public, and, therefore, the development could not <br /> be constructed. <br /> Ron MacQuarr�e (see above) stated he believes the proposed develop- <br /> ment will be successful with or without private streets, observing <br /> that he prefers public streets, but would not oppose the pro�ect if <br /> private streets are necessary <br /> Phillip Cunnings, 561 Cringle> sug9ested that the homes be built <br /> farther from the property line, noting that they will be 7 feet <br /> from the line while his home was required to be 25 feet from the <br /> line. <br /> Mayor Leipzig invited anyone else present who wished to speak to <br /> do so No one else in the audience wished to do so <br /> MOTION Councilman Barrett moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi, to <br /> close the public hearing <br /> MOTION WITHDRAWN Upon the request of Ray Salem to speak, Council- <br /> inan Barrett, with the consent of his second, withdrew his motion <br /> Ray Salem, #308, 1614 Hudson Street, suggested that a proposed�shop- <br /> ping center and other commercial development would benefit Redwood <br /> Shores taxpayers and urged disapproval of the proposed residential ' <br /> development. In response to question as to whether Mr Salem sup- <br /> ports the shopping center proposed for the area, Mr. Salem stated <br /> that as a conservationist, he does not want any development there. <br /> Clara Bergman, 563 Marlin Court, real estate sales person, not repre- <br /> senting Bren Co , critized Council for closing the hearing without <br /> commenting themselves on the proposed development It was explained <br /> to Mrs Bergman that the motion which was withdrawn was to close the <br /> public hearing after which Council will consider the application for <br /> PDP taking the testimony heard during the Hearing into consideration <br /> in making their decision <br /> MOTION Councilman Barrett moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi,, to <br /> close the public hearing . � <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote <br /> The public hearing was closed at 10 40 p m <br /> (Council recessed from 10 41 to 10 50 p m) <br /> MOTION• Title having been read, Louncilman Norris introduced the <br /> following resolution and moved its adoption with the amendment that <br /> all streets in the proposed development be public streets ' <br /> The motion died for lack of a second <br /> -4- <br /> Reg Mtg. <br /> 5/3/76 <br />