My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIIN 1976
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
CC MIIN 1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2011 4:47:43 PM
Creation date
8/2/2011 4:47:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/5/1976
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3'5��� � <br /> to rev�ew the proposed Element, that the Element be reviewed by the <br /> appropriate City departments, and that the provisions of Senate B111 <br /> 927 be considered also <br /> City Attorney Schricker reminded Council that Council must consider <br /> what is sent to them by the Plannin9 Commission on proposed Elements , <br /> to the General Plan and that Council may refer the proposed Element <br /> for task force type study while holding the public hearing in abeyance <br /> until a certain time pending receipt of the task force report. <br /> ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT TO and CHANGE OF MOTION Councilman Barrett, <br /> with the consent of his second, moved to continue consideration of <br /> the proposed Element for three months pending receipt of the task <br /> force report rather than to continue consideration until May 10, 1976. <br /> Marcia Poncia 408 Alameda, suggested that the proposed Nistoric <br /> Element ha� had considerable citizen review, three drafts having <br /> been studied by the Civic Cultural Commission with much of the <br /> material proposed having been contained in the original citizen <br /> questionnaire of the City , <br /> WITHDRAWAL OF SECOND Councilman Rhodes withdrew his second of the <br /> motion as amended and changed. <br /> The motion died for lack of a second � <br /> MOTION Councilman Barrett moved, seconded by Councilman Bury, to ' <br /> continue consideration of the proposed Historic Element of the <br /> General Plan until May 17, 1976 <br /> The motion carried by ma�ority voice vote, Councilmen Biagi and , <br /> Rhodes voting "No " , (MINUTE ORDER N0. 76-113) <br /> Consideration of Recommendation in Leg�slative <br /> Re ort No. 76-1 re Pro osition No. 15 <br /> continued from 4/26/76 <br /> Councilman Barrett, Vice Chairman of the Legislative Cortmittee, <br /> read the Committee recommendation that Council go on record in <br /> opposition to State Ballot Proposition No. 15 regarding Nuclear <br /> Power Plants. <br /> MOTION Councilman Barrett moved that Council approve the recom- <br /> mendation of the Legislative Committee to oppose State Ballot <br /> Proposition No 15 <br /> The motion died for lack of a second <br /> Councilman Rhodes advised he will not participate in any discussion <br /> nor vote concerning Proposition 15 because he owns stock in Pacific <br /> Gas & Electric Company and other utility stock. (Councilman Rhodes <br /> left the Council Chambers at 11 20 p m.) <br /> � - � ' <br /> MOTION Councilman Bury moved, seconded by Councilman Norris, that ' <br /> the Council�make no recommendation regarding State Ballot Proposition <br /> No 15. <br /> -6- <br /> Reg.Mtg. <br /> 5/3/76 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.