Laserfiche WebLink
,r <br /> 3T9 8 <br /> Police Protection (Alternatives, pp 12-13) <br /> During discussion regarding the School Crossing Guards, Mr. Fales <br /> and Police Chief Bold commented and responded to questions by Council, <br /> indicating that the Crossing Guards are directly supervised by City <br /> patrolmen, are funded by the City rather than the School Districts, � <br /> and that the crossing guards provide a necessary service It was <br /> also noted that the elementary school districts are in a financial <br /> bind, possibly worse than the cities, and do assume the responsi- <br /> bility for the students within school grounds The determination <br /> of where the guards are located is made by the City staff. . <br /> MOTION Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Counctlman Barrett <br /> for the purpose of discuss�on, to delete School Crossing Guards � <br /> positions from the budget, with funding to be by the Elementary <br /> School District <br /> Discussion followed with respect to the necess7ty to provide the <br /> proper level of safety for school children and that ii, is of such <br /> importance there should be no dispute about who pays for this <br /> service, that whichever agency pays for it, the burden would still <br /> be on the taxpayer <br /> MOTION WITHDRAWN Councilman Norris, with the consent of hts second, <br /> withdrew the motion <br /> Marcia Poncia 408 Alameda, spoke in support of retention of the � <br /> School Crossing Guards, noting that assumption of responsibility <br /> for the children on the school grounds is determined by insurance <br /> requirements � <br /> Parks and Recreation Department (pp 78-87) <br /> Mr Fales reviewed the proposed departmental budget, noting that it <br /> , contains four basic functions, summarized on Page 78. <br /> Park Maintenance - Account No 710 (pp 82-83) <br /> Mr Fales advised that the 7ncrease in the proposed bud9et is due to , <br /> salary and related costs already approved, and also increases in costs <br /> of supplies, including water He noted that with the addition of some _ <br /> new parks, the inability to add personnel was regretable, since it will <br /> be impossible to maintain the high standards of maintenance as in the past <br /> Discussion cont�nued regarding maintenance of School District property <br /> the City mainta�ns for athletic programs, the deterioration that occurs <br /> in turfing, benches, etc , and the hi9h level of usage and full <br /> schedule of activities at the parks, particula'rly Red Morton Community <br /> Park <br /> Account No 710 was approved as submitted <br /> Recreation Proqrams - Account No 730 (pp 84-85) `" <br /> Mr fales reviewed the subprogram budget and in the following <br /> discussion, one suggestion was the use of volunteers from some � <br /> of the recreation participants to serve as umpires, rather than <br /> contracting for those services (Alternatives, Page 21) <br /> MOTION Councilman Norris moved to delete $7,500 from the Recrea- <br /> tion Budget for Umpire Salaries � <br /> , _ <br /> Budget Study . <br /> 5j22/76 <br />