Laserfiche WebLink
420 � <br /> Revenue Sharing (Continued)_ <br /> In response to question with regard to use of the films for fund <br /> raising, Mrs. Klapproth advised that she is not aware of such use <br /> and that many films specifically may not be used for such purposes, <br /> but that no charge is made for use of the films. In further <br /> response to question, Mrs Klapproth said that the art collection , <br /> was started by a private donation and addit�ons have been made by <br /> f'riends of the Library. - <br /> i! MOTION• Councilman Bury moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi, that � <br /> " w�th regard to Revenue Sharing funds allocated to the City L�6rary <br /> in the amount of $19,000 for Audio Visual Materials, that the amount , <br /> be reduced by the $10,000 allocated for the purchase of films and <br /> that attempts be made to get cooperation from the schools in using <br /> thetr films. <br /> Mrs. Klapproth requested that the Library Board be permitted to <br /> determine whether they might not prefer to take the $10,000 from <br /> some other part of the budget, since the purchase of films to <br /> complete the phased program has been a high priority item with the <br /> Board. ' ' � , <br /> � 4 <br /> CLARIFICATION. Councilman Bury stated that it was not the intent�ion <br /> of'his motion'that the $10,000 be taken from any other part of,the <br /> Librery budget. � � ' � <br /> � , � <br /> Discussion followed concerning the phased film purchase program; <br /> the desirability o,f ineeting standards set for a library for a c,ity <br /> of the size of Redwood City w�th regard to films available; the <br /> poss,ibility of mak�ng a reasonable charge for use of the films; the , <br /> probability that individuals cannot use the films since they would <br /> not have 16 mm pro�ectors, the fact that such pro3ectors a're , <br /> u`sually rented by organizations and are available on'the same ba'sis <br /> to individuals, the fact that purchase of a pro�ector for loan by <br /> the City has been considered and re�ected because of high cost of <br /> maintenance, and the fact that the City can no longer afford serv�ces <br /> which,must be considered luxuries. , ' , , � <br /> ; The motion carried by ma,7ority voice vote, one "No"'vote'being ' <br /> recorded. <br /> Mayor Leipzig reminded Council that the $10,000 deleted from the <br /> L�brary allocat�on �s now returned to unallocated Revenue Sharing' <br /> funds. <br /> RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM , <br /> , <br /> MOTION. Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman Barrett,� <br /> to allocate to the Retired Senior Volunteer Program $5,420Trequested <br /> by that organizat7on from the unallocated Revenue Sharing Funds. <br /> Favorable correnent concerning the Program was made and it was ' <br /> observed that RSVP is making a one-time request. (See Minutes of <br /> Budget Study Session of May 25, 1976 - page 5) ` , <br /> The motion carried una m mously by voice vote � r <br /> ` ' ' � ' (MINUTE ORDER N0. 76-154) <br /> , <br /> " -5- , • . <br /> Budget Study <br /> 6/5/76 <br /> � _ ' <br />