Laserfiche WebLink
��� <br /> Senior Citizen Development - <br /> Abandonment of Hilton Street <br /> City Manager Fales referred to his report of July 9, 1976 regarding <br /> the sub�ect abandonment and attaching a report from the Director of <br /> ' Public Works dated June 23 Mr Fales advised that the only action <br /> required now is to set the public hearing and recommended August 2, <br /> 1976 for the hearing <br /> MOTION. title having been read, Councilman Norris introduced the <br /> following resolution and moved, seconded by Councilman Biagi, its <br /> adoption with the date for public hearing set for August 2, 1976 <br /> RESOLUTION NO 7638 OF INTENTION TO ABANDON PORTION OF PUBLIC <br /> STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART 3 OF DIVISION 9, STREETS AND <br /> HIGHWAY CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING fOR THE <br /> RESERVATION OF A CERTAIN EASEt4ENT THEREFROM, SETTING TIME AND <br /> PLACE FOR HEARING ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN OR OBJECTING TO THE <br /> PROPOSED VACATION, AND ORDERING POSTING OF NOTICE OF SUCH <br /> PROPOSED VACATION <br /> The resolution was adopted unanimously by roll call vote <br /> Work Unit Additions - Palm Park, Phase I <br /> City Manager fales referred to his report of July 9, 1976 regarding <br /> the sub�ect additions and attaching report from the Director of Parks <br /> and Recreation dated July 2 <br /> , MOTION Councilman Rhodes moved, seconded by Councilman Vega, to <br /> authorize staff to proceed with the two addttional work units for <br /> Palm Park, Phase I(concrete access walks totaling $3,006 and con- <br /> crete curbing around the play apparatus totaling $2,904) <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote <br /> � (MINUTE ORDER NO 76-198) <br /> Report re Lighting on E1 Camino Real <br /> City Manager Fales referred to his report of July 9, 1976 regarding <br /> E1 Camino Real Street Lighting Pro�ect and attaching report from the <br /> Director of Public Works dated July 9 also <br /> Director of Public Works Pusich commented concerning the type of <br /> light produced by the recommended sodium lights compared to conven- <br /> tional mercury vapor lights, noting the light is yellow-orange rather <br /> than white <br /> In response to Council cormnent, Mr Fales advised that the City will <br /> make a submittal to the Public Utilities Commission regarding the <br /> PG&E rate schedule which does not recognize the energy saving poten- <br /> tial Uf the high pressure sodium lights and urging that any new schedule <br /> , take into account the energy use of a particular lamp and not �ust <br /> the light produced <br /> A1 Dixon, 1171 Kandle Way, observed that the sodium lamps long <br /> used on the bay bridges affect the appearance of colors <br /> -5- <br /> Reg.Mtg. <br /> 7/12/76 <br />