Laserfiche WebLink
i , � <br /> � <br /> T�:�:tion �g45-3 to M. Weber. The motion was eeconded by Councilman Britschgi <br /> and on roll call r esolution was una.nimously adopted. <br /> , Councilman Anderson offered reaolution and moved its adoption ordering <br /> work done and awarding bid.for ��rork to be done under Resolution of Inten- <br /> tion No �9�5-� to M. Pleber. The motion was aeconded by Councilman Flet- <br /> cher and on roll ca11 resolution was unanimously adopted. <br /> ' City Attorney McCarthy explained that the City Clerk is directed to <br /> post a notice of the aorard and that any property owner has the r7g ht to <br /> perPorm hi� own contract a�ithin ten days after the posting oP such notice <br /> of award. He said the city cannot let the contract for ten days after <br /> the award of the contract. He Purther exolained tY�at bidders' checka <br /> are retained until the contracts are Piled in the event t:�at the fir.at <br /> • lowe�t bidders fail to execute the contract in which case the c heck of <br /> such bidder is for°eited to the city arri the award can be made to the <br /> s'econd lowest bidder. Councilman Granger asked if the contractora who <br /> are to do the work are eub�ect to the usual business license. C�ity Manager . <br /> Mead replied that they are sub�ect to the contractor�s lic aiee. <br /> City Manager Mead advi.�sed that he had discussed further with Mr. Uhlenberg:<the <br /> ' matter of a procedure of handling weed abatement and sidewalk ir�nrove- <br /> �aent expenditures. He said that Idr. Uhlenberg haci advised him that St <br /> didn�t make any differer�ce from Nr?�at account the money ie taken but he <br /> recommended it be takPn from the water de�rt�nent account. He did not <br /> �> believe it would be a�vlsable to carry it in the suspense account. Council- . <br /> � man Arm�trong asked if this matter uras not being accounted for in the new <br /> budget. City Manager Mead advised tha.t it was not in the preliminary bud- <br /> get but r be in the Pinal budget. In answer to Councilman Anderson's <br /> � queation as to how the�money would be returned to the water department, <br /> he adviaed that o�hen payment e Hrere made by the individual property <br /> oumer it would be denosited to the water department. He advised in reply <br /> to Councilman Arr.ictrong�e q_ueation that it would be necessary to transfer <br /> �5000 for weed abatement and �1400 for sidewalk improvement work to June j0. <br /> , Councilman Anderson on the recom;aendation of Mr. Uhlenberg offered resolu- <br /> � <br /> tion and moved its adoption that �5000 to cover weed abatement be trans- <br /> ferred from the Water Department with payments to be returned to the <br /> water department in full. The motion was second.ed by Councilman Arr.�_ <br /> , strong and on roll call passed un�nimously. <br /> Councilman Armstrong oPfered resolution and moved its adoption authorizing trans- <br /> fer of �1�00 from the water department to the sidewalk impro venent fund <br /> � i�ith the provlso that it be retimned to the water denartment Uihen colleeted. <br /> The motion was seconded b;� Councilman Aadereon and on roll call resolution <br /> was unanicnously adopted. <br /> . <br />