My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Resolution PC 96-1 Flatirons Funding
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
Resolution PC 96-1 Flatirons Funding
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2012 6:18:38 PM
Creation date
1/19/2012 6:06:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Date
6/19/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
f} 1n .1 983, Redwood Shores, Inc. voluntarily reduced heights of buildings within <br />two flight corridors at San Carlos .Airport to 50 feet above ground level (60 feet MSL). <br />The flight corridors are incorporated into the pity's General Plan. The Project does <br />not conflict with the flight corridors. <br />(g) With the approval of the Planned Development Permit, the Project is <br />consistent with the Commercial Park zoning on the site.. The heights of all of the <br />Project buildings, including the 7 8 and 10 story buildings, are in conformance with the <br />Safety Element of the City's General Plan., which allows building heights of up to 150 <br />feet above airport elevation (2 feet MSL) under the horizontal surface as described in <br />FAR Part 77, Subpart C. <br />(h) Facts (b) and (e).m* support of finding 3.1.1, and the findings and facts in <br />sup o findings include in Section 3.1 %, hereby are incorporated by reference. <br />3,2 GEOTECBMCAL CONSIDERATIONS <br />3,2.1 Potential Effect: feet: Differential settlement could result ill stru ctural damage to <br />buildings., pavement and utility systems. <br />Findi s; The City .hereby makes Finding (1). <br />Facts In Support o Findin <br />( a) The geotechnical report for the Proj ect includes recommendations regarding <br />settlement. The Planned Development Permit requires the applicant to comply <br />with all recornniendations of the geotechnical report. <br />(b) Settlement is not unique to the Project site; it tends to accompany most <br />p <br />roj ' ects that are built upon rece placed fill. The geotechnical report prepared <br />for the Project concludes that sail and geotechnical conditions at the site are <br />:suitable for the proposed development. The geotechnical conditions at the site are <br />sum ar to those at other properties ernes the vicinity which have been successfully <br />developed. <br />(c) Although the Redwood Peninsula .EIR. identifies this impact as signifi <br />it also acknawled es that problems can be rnija i i e <br />n d by taking settlement into <br />g <br />account at the design stage. It Also acknowledges that any costs associated with <br />settlement p roblems Will be borne b y p rivate owners. The features .incorporated <br />into the Prv` ect, as identified above, will itigate impact to below a level of <br />si cance. <br />1 .2- <br />�NGPL <br />- . <br />5r3 0/91 0:5 AM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.