My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2008-04-14
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
CC Min 2008-04-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2012 1:32:44 PM
Creation date
2/21/2012 1:30:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
4/18/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Public Comment: <br />t: <br />Peggy Bruggman, with time donated b y Merrily Robinson, commented on what the measure <br />would ld and would not accomplish in her opinion. Ms. Bruggman believes that election costs' <br />concems are not valid because it is not anticipated that there will be many developments in <br />this particular land designation. Ms. B ruggman stated that the two requirement is <br />clearly outlined in all information regarding the initiative. She made comments about the <br />Cargill site and the plans to develop it. <br />David Lewis, Executive Director of Save the Bay, with time donated by Matt Leddy, spoke <br />about the open Space Vote amendment and he explained that it would cover any <br />development that is not are allowed use already under the current zoning and general <br />designation. H named the various organizations that support this measure: Save the Bay, <br />Friends of Redwood, Local Audubon chapter, Local Sierra Club, Committee for Greer <br />Foothills, Clean Water Action, etc. He shared what he believes are the benefits of the <br />measure and opined it does not impact current pses. <br />Aaron Yakl gian with Trumark Companies said that he opposes this measure due to impacts <br />to Doc to n and other properties. He explained details about the site and how Trumark <br />Companies is developing a new vision for the site. He mentioned that if the charter <br />A mendment passes the property will stay the same. <br />Gwenyte J. Scove spoke in support of the open Space V ote. She opined that currently <br />there is ittle open space area. She is hopeful that people will sign the petition and she i <br />hopeful for some restoration of the tidal marshes. She disapproves of any development in <br />the salt ponds area. <br />David Smith made comments t about the public process and shared concerns with the cost <br />of possible elections. He stated that, as a resident, he would like multiple issues to b e <br />considered and not just open space. <br />Ralph Nobles, said that he is a long time resident, and he announced the :iop ning� F of the <br />signature gathering campaign. Mr. Nobles is one of the ounders of "Friends of Redwood <br />City" and made comments about a meeting that occurred 26 years ago. His goal is to <br />protect all of Redwood City's residents. He spoke about restoration of the baylands. Mr. <br />Nobles finds the signature gathering a rewarding activity. <br />Fete Hughes spoke about elected officials being the voice of the people. He does not <br />support holding special elections for such items like development. <br />t. <br />cl erlene carpentier shared her concerns about comments made that might b e inaccurate <br />and set up an adversarial relationship. She believes that the reason for this measure is <br />IB & Associates and prat she called a done deal ". Is. Carpentier said she hopes for a <br />civil debate. <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING APRIL 14, 200 <br />MINUTES PAGE <br />MINUTE BOOK No. 62 <br />Page Flo. 61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.