Agmt12 Panamora Environmental, Inc.

Browse Search

"to the extent feasible." This language, taken by itself, could be interpreted to suggest that full mitigation may not be feasible. Review the two geology measures and provide revised text regarding the feasibility of the measures. Review all other mitigation measures to ensure none of the other mitigation measures contain the qualifying language; measures would be revised to remove the qualifying language. Sub-task 3.2: Incorporate Average House Size Information Appendix C of the Final EIR identifies the building square footage of other homes in the vicinity of the proposed development. Correct the data in Appendix C to reflect the information in Heather Bradley's memo (dated July 27, 2011) on average house sizes. Add this information to the Errata. Sub-task 3.2: Incorporate Methodology for Alternative B FAR Formula Incorporate into the Errata a discussion of the methodology used to arrive at the Alternative B floor area ratio (FAR) formula. Supporting information from the General Plan regarding hillside development will be included as appropriate. Deliverable: The information discussed in the Sub-tasks above will be incorporated into the Errata sheet and will be submitted to the City within 3.5 weeks of the authorization to proceed. Responding to City comments will be conducted under Task 4. TASK 4: REVISE THE FINAL EIR Subtask 4.1: Prepare Administrative Draft Final EIR Prepare the Administrative Draft Revised Final EIR for City staff and legal review. The Revised Final EIR will include all sections in the first Final EIR. Key sections will be revised as directed by City. The new information will be presented in tracked changes for the Administrative Final and Check Final. The Revised Final EIR will show the changes to the Introduction, Errata, and References in underlined and ��e�# text. The document will include the results of the previous tasks and subtasks. Specific subtasks to perform to prepare the Revised Final EIR include: Introduction: 1. Update project history to describe what has happened since the Planning Commission approved the Final EIR (e.g., the appeal and the revised Project Description) 2. Provide a table and discussion that translates the old lot numbers from the Draft EIR to the new lot numbers presented in the revised project 3. Describe what is different in the Revised EIR Revised Errata: 1. Incorporate City comments on description of new project 2. Incorporate City comments on Revised Errata 3. Elimination of references to the Development Agreement ATTY/AGR/2012.035/PANORAMA ENVIRONMENTAL INC FOR LAUREL WAY PROJECT REV:04-20-12 VR Page 11 of 13