AgdaPkt 2012-07-09 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.1.E. - Page 20 Hoo�..� Community school programs reached 71% of students at Hoover in 2010-11. As Exhibit 8a shows, about 35% of Hoover students accessed extended learning opportunities in 2010-11. These students averaged nearly 90 days of participation and included 74% English learner and 89%FRPL participants. Nearly one quarter of Hoover students had parents participate in family engagement programs. Parent events had the highest rate of participation at 14%,but parent education programs had the most average days of participation at 10. Students with parents in family engagement programs tended to have higher prior CST proficiency rates than students in other program categories. Support programs served 55% of Hoover students, 75% of whom were English learners and 83%of whom received FRI'L. Students whose families received support had the lowest CST proficiency rates compared to participants in any other strategy area. Students with no program participation were less likely to participate in FRPL and had higher CST proficiency rates in 2009-10 than participants in most program categories. Exhibit 8a: Program Participation and Participant Characteristics at Hoover,2010-11 Participation Participant Characteristics ELA Math % Avg Free/Red. Parents English Proficient Proficient Part. Days Male Female Lunch no HS Learner 2009-10 2009-10 Extended Learning 34.6% 87.6 56.6% 43.4% 89.2% 61.2% 73.8% 27.5% 47.5% After School 30.7% 98.7 55.9% 44.1% 93.8% 64.2% 73.3% 27.8% 47.8% Summer/Intercession 6.4% 2.1 58.3% 41.7% 71.7% 60.0% 85.0% 25.0% 60.0% Youth Leadership 1.1% * 90.0% 10.0% 100.0% 40.0% 70.0% 11.1% 22.2% Family Engagement 23.4% 8.1 51.4% 48.6% 91.4% 68.2% 75.0% 34.2% 54.8% Parent Leadership 2.8% 1.5 50.0% 50.0% 92.3% 53.8% 73.1% 21.1% 63.2% Parent Education 11.0% 10.4 50.0% 46.6% 90.3% 66.0% 73.8% 32.8% 54.7% School-Home Communication 11.0% 2.8 53.4% 53.4% 93.2% 66.0% 67.0% 43.4% 59.2% Parent Events 14.1% 1.8 46.6% 50.8% 90.2% 62.1% 77.3% 33.3% 57.1% Parent Volunteerism 6.9% 2.1 52.3% 47.7% 92.3% 61.5% 69.2% 42.5% 57.5% Support 55.3% * 53.4% 46.6% 82.7% 59.7% 75.0% 26.3% 45.5% Counseling 19.4% * 56.0% 44.0% 87.9% 59.3% 68.7% 23.5% 22.8% Family Assistance 43.2% * 51.7% 48.3% 81.5% 60.6% 79.3% 25.2% 55.1% No Program Participation 28.9% * 50.2% 49.8% 63.1% 38.7% 74.5% 32.5% 52.8% *Note:Daily attendance data were not available for these categories. Exhibit Sb:Student Survey Results at Hoover,2011 Hoover students in after school programs reported positive experiences and attitudes Challenge 71� g3/ 0 (Exhibit 8b). Among students who 86� participated in the after school survey (who Confidence 81� were mostly students with high program �� participation), around three-quarters said Mutual Respect �� that they felt cared for and that staff used Sense of Care � 72� practices that promoted mutual respect. Additionally, 86%reported confidence in 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% their abilities, and 83% said that staff ❑In School ■After School challenged them to think. Students' sense of care in after school programs was much higher than in school,but students'were more likely to report being challenged to think in school than after school. Redwood City Community Schools Evaluation:2010-11 Evaluation Report Page 8