Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.A. - Page 13 <br /> Steven Knight, representing Save the Bay and their thousands of inembers, expressed <br /> their thanks to Council regarding the application (withdrawal) and their hope this is a <br /> permanent end to it. He spoke in favor of saving the bay through restoration and cited <br /> Bair Island as an example. He opined that Cargill should and can restore this land. <br /> Alice Kaufman, a legislative advocate for the Committee for Green Foothills, spoke <br /> against this project and any such future projects and opined that this land is clearly not <br /> for people to live and work on. She said this is one of few areas that can be restored for <br /> wetlands, is bad for development, and there are better places to build housing as <br /> identified in the General Plan. <br /> Kaye Bonney, representing Redwood City Neighbors United, said they are glad about <br /> the application being withdrawn. She opined that consideration of an application must <br /> be sure to include a reliable and consistent source of water and safety against rising <br /> sea levels in the bay. <br /> Jerry Brick, a resident for almost 40 years and with Redwood City Neighbors United, <br /> opined that nothing else is needed in this area with housing in others areas. He <br /> expressed his gratitude to City Council and the Ad Hoc Committee for their <br /> consideration of the proposal. He expressed pride in community involvement and <br /> action and spoke in favor of the work small grass-roots groups of citizens can do make <br /> change in the community. <br /> Margaret Timothy spoke against development at the salt ponds and is proud it worked <br /> out. She spoke in favor of development downtown and opined that it has bloomed, with <br /> a lot of infill, Courthouse Square, the theater, and wonderful new restaurants. She <br /> opined that there is a concern with rising sea levels in future and why expose ourselves <br /> needlessly. <br /> Emily Schnipper, a member of Redwood City Neighbors United and Occupy, expressed <br /> thanks for Council's rejection of Saltworks and relief that they can stop fighting against it <br /> and do something else to help Redwood City. She spoke in favor of continuing to take <br /> a strong stance against it as the land is not suitable for housing and that we have a <br /> great General Plan. She agreed with Council Member Pierce's prior comments about <br /> the voters of Redwood City, but still she believes there is misleading information. <br /> Shaunn Cartwright, representing Occupy San Jose, thanked Council for doing the right <br /> thing three times and allowing her to speak again. She was very happy people stayed <br /> until the end of the meeting. She spoke against certain individuals in regards to <br /> interconnections with DMB, Walmart Board and the Hyatt Board and how they are bad <br /> for unions and she spoke in favor of tracking where the money is and to not back these <br /> businesses. <br /> Joseph Rosas, a candidate for State Assembly with a precinct in Redwood City, <br /> commented that most of the facts had already been stated regarding sea level rise and <br /> liquefaction during earthquakes. He expressed thanks to all the groups that have fought <br /> against this, which included Occupy Redwood City, Occupy San Jose, Redwood City <br /> Neighbors United, and Menlo Park City Council. <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIUSUCCESSOR AGENCY May 7, 2012 <br /> MEETING MINUTES PAGE 10 <br />