Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.A. - Page 14 <br /> Daniel Ponti, a longtime resident and representing Redwood City Neighbors United, <br /> said one of their one goals was the withdrawal of the application. He thanked the Ad <br /> Hoc Committee, and opined the correct decision was made, and the proposal was <br /> controversial and divisive and was about our values. He also expressed concerns on <br /> various types of land use in terms of intertidal zones, heavy Industry, compatibility, and <br /> housing goals in regards to the general plan. <br /> Carolyn Chaney expressed pride and thanks for the Styrofoam ban and spoke in favor <br /> of banning single-use plastic bags. She spoke against the Saltworks proposal and any <br /> future such proposals as never being acceptable in terms of the impact to the <br /> environment. <br /> Aaron Castle, representing Occupy Saltworks, thanked Council and Occupy San Jose <br /> for their commitment to change. He spoke about affordable housing in future <br /> developments and his hope for the future. <br /> James Lee, representing Occupy Saltworks and a resident, thanked the Ad Hoc <br /> Committee. He said he believes there is a lack of leadership in Redwood City and <br /> spoke against the Plan and their hope that others will take a stand and not waste City <br /> resources. He also opined that what happened earlier showed a lack in how to deal <br /> appropriately with public discourse. <br /> Lou Covey, a resident of the Friendly Acres area, spoke in favor of seeing the Plan, <br /> having an advisory vote on the ballot asking the population should development be <br /> prohibited on the Saltworks property and answer the question regarding what people <br /> really want to do in Redwood City. He opined that City Council does an incredible job <br /> and it is a thankless job but he personally thanked the Council. <br /> David Amann, a long-time resident, thanked Council for gathering the information <br /> despite the contentiousness and accusations and impacts to their families. He <br /> cautioned being aware of the costs of these decisions with longer commutes, more <br /> carbon emissions, and it being more expensive to live here, but he also questioned how <br /> can we know if the benefits can outweigh these costs. He spoke in favor of an advisory <br /> vote in November. <br /> Victor Torreano, Vice President of the San Mateo Building Trades Council and a <br /> resident, spoke in favor of seeking community input for consensus on what is best. He <br /> spoke about construction jobs and area housing and opined this is a construction dead <br /> zone with many crafters (and construction workers) living locally and being unemployed. <br /> Jim Kirkland spoke in favor of the 50-50 balanced plan, the need for tax revenue, and <br /> the creation of more jobs. He said there are many small business owners here and that <br /> have been many factions that are opposed and made many attacks against Council and <br /> others which led to an all or nothing attitude and polarization. He opined that if this <br /> passes, he believes there will be no restoration of the land and that neither Occupy or <br /> others have funds to do so and the land will remain salt ponds. He spoke in favor of the <br /> election. <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIUSUCCESSOR AGENCY May 7, 2012 <br /> MEETING MINUTES PAGE 11 <br />