Laserfiche WebLink
� 6.1. D. - Page 16 <br /> • Parking management plan <br /> Task 2.2 Technology Eval�aation <br /> Consultant shall survey the City's existing system, including a check of poir�t-to-point <br /> comrnunications (if necessary) with proper test equipment (e.g. EGOTDR for fiber optics) and <br /> shall interview operations staff to understand issues with current equipment. Based on the <br /> e�aluation, Consuftant shall develop a tailored saEutinn which rnay include some of the following: <br /> replacing copper with fiber to impro�e reliability, replacing or upgrading the operating sys�e�n <br /> from Windows, wireless (line of site) andlor ce[lular communications adjustments. <br /> Task 2.2 Deliverahles <br /> • Task 2.2 Technical memo - Technology Evaluation <br /> Task 2.3 Best I'ractices <br /> Consultant shall evaluate parking management practices in up to four case studies comparable <br /> to downtown Redwood City. Cor�s�ltant shalf select case studies that ha�e strategies anc4 <br /> policies that directly relate to the City`s challenges. Rele�an� findirtgs af bes# practices shall b� <br /> de�eloped and pro�ided as detailed examples and excerpts far each case study city for the <br /> de[i�erables fisted in Task 2.1 (technical memo and parking management plan}. Bes# practice <br /> exampl�s may include but are not limited to: analysis of pricing struct�re and policies, finance <br /> strategies, employee parking programs, and parking sup�ly de�elopment. Particular focus shall <br /> be paid to model shared use agreements (e.g. Portland, OR and Seattle, WA). <br /> Task 3.0 Supply Evaluatiort I <br /> Task 3.1 Park�ng Supply Needs <br /> The parking beha�iors determined by Consuitant's utilization analysis shall be #he basis for I <br /> assessing the baseline needs ar�d deficiencies in the current parking system. Data shall also be I <br /> analyzed to determine a parking deficit or surplus gi�en current demand (segmented by I <br /> dowr�town subarea). Cor�sultant shall analyze the occupancy data to deterrr�ine if #here is �' <br /> sufficient on- and off-s#reet supply. Consuitar�t shali overlay the demand profile on the existing !, <br /> downtown precESe plan map �o indicate w�ere there are gaps and th€�s strong demar�d for more ! <br /> supply. Hot spats and deficits shalE be tabulated and mapped by dowr�town subarea. ', <br /> Tas�C 3.2 Future Parking Demand Analysis ', <br /> Consultant shall tai6or the parking demand model developed for the MTC 5mart Growth Parking ' <br /> Study to calibrate baseline parking demand to existing land uses in the study area as this ' <br /> modePs special feature is that it produces demand estimates that are specific �o the ' <br /> characteristics of the area being studied in terms of land use, parking supply, parking costs, and <br /> #ransit availability. , <br /> To estimate future demand, Cansul#ant shall pro�ide a baseline model that can be populafed <br /> with future de�elopment scenario(s) to estimate future parking demand for �he City study area. <br /> Consuitant shall pro�id� a model that can be de�eloped ir� one or more scenarios to determine <br /> a le�el of development that triggers the need for new parking sup�ly or other management <br /> interventior�s. <br /> For this task, the City staff shall deuelap the scenarios and Cor�sultant shall guide city staff in <br /> the popuiation of the model. <br /> ATTYIAGR.2012.1751CQM SMITH ING. <br /> REV: 11-1-92 VR <br /> Page 13 of 19 <br />