Laserfiche WebLink
• Parking management plan <br /> Task 2.2 Technology Evaluation <br /> Consultant shall survey the City's existing system, including a check of point-to-point <br /> communications (if necessary) with proper test equipment (e.g. EGOTDR for fiber optics) and <br /> shall interview operations staff to understand issues with current equipment. Based on the <br /> evaluation, Consultant shall develop a tailored solution which may include some of the following: <br /> replacing copper with fiber to improve reliability, replacing or upgrading the operating system <br /> from Windows, wireless (line of site) and/or cellular communications adjustments. <br /> Task 2.2 Deliverables <br /> • Task 2.2 Technical memo -Technology Evaluation <br /> Task 2.3 Best Practices <br /> Consultant shall evaluate parking management practices in up to four case studies comparable <br /> to downtown Redwood City. Consultant shall select case studies that have strategies and <br /> policies that directly relate to the City's challenges. Relevant findings of best practices shall be <br /> developed and provided as detailed examples and excerpts for each case study city for the <br /> deliverables listed in Task 2.1 (technical memo and parking management plan). Best practice <br /> examples may include but are not limited to: analysis of pricing structure and policies, finance <br /> strategies, employee parking programs, and parking supply development. Particular focus shall <br /> be paid to model shared use agreements (e.g. Portland, OR and Seattle, WA). <br /> Task 3.0 Supply Evaluation <br /> Task 3.1 Parking Supply Needs <br /> The parking behaviors determined by Consultant's utilization analysis shall be the basis for <br /> assessing the baseline needs and deficiencies in the current parking system. Data shall also be <br /> analyzed to determine a parking deficit or surplus given current demand (segmented by <br /> downtown subarea). Consultant shall analyze the occupancy data to determine if there is <br /> sufficient on- and off-street supply. Consultant shall overlay the demand profile on the existing <br /> downtown precise plan map to indicate where there are gaps and thus strong demand for more <br /> supply. Hot spots and deficits shall be tabulated and mapped by downtown subarea. <br /> Task 3.2 Future Parking Demand Analysis <br /> Consultant shall tailor the parking demand model developed for the MTC Smart Growth Parking <br /> Study to calibrate baseline parking demand to existing land uses in the study area as this <br /> model's special feature is that it produces demand estimates that are specific to the <br /> characteristics of the area being studied in terms of land use, parking supply, parking costs, and <br /> transit availability. <br /> To estimate future demand, Consultant shall provide a baseline model that can be populated <br /> with future development scenario(s) to estimate future parking demand for the City study area. <br /> Consultant shall provide a model that can be developed in one or more scenarios to determine <br /> a level of development that triggers the need for new parking supply or other management <br /> interventions. <br /> For this task, the City staff shall develop the scenarios and Consultant shall guide city staff in <br /> the population of the model. <br /> ATTY/AGR.2012.175/CDM SMITH INC. <br /> REV: 11-1-12 VR <br /> Page 13 of 19 <br />