Minutes 1966 Jan to June - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ti. til e had nov., bee- � � O Lc ter;.inate her business �a r a(,.V l�;eC 'tJ" bo��i"; her �ti �Oi'f e�T a''1C? i Ct�:r' � � connections. Mr. Kamm stated lease expired on the premises on March 31st and it vaas not intended lease be renewed. Councilman i,.eymouth moved to grant Closinr1 Out Permit in accordance with City Manager's recommendation for 45 days only from January 24th to March 10th, seconded by Council- man Royer. Councilman Bury offered amended motion to limit Closing -Out Sale to 3O days, seconded by Councilman Granger and lost on roll call vote, Councilmen Bury and Granger voting, ye,,,, Councilmen Hcri ner, Peter::en, Royer, 1- eymouth and Mayor Rosselli voting no. Ori;;inal motion to grant Closing -Out Sale for period of L15 days from January 24th to Piarch 10th, carried on roll call vote, Councilmen Herkner, Peter .ion, Royer, Weymouth and Mayor Rosselli voting yes, Councilmen Bury and Granger voting no ( MIT LUTE ORDER Appliceti.on of Ruth Freyer, Carollo, 2209-11 Broadway, for Closing -Out Sale presented for consideration. Staff reported applicant is retiring from business and is moving; out of the area; deposit, inventory and advertising had been submitted for checking. City Manager stated Staff recommended grant-i.l',g permit for 30 days, i.n view of compara- tively small stock. Councilman Granger moved to grant Permit for 30 day Closing Out Sale to Mrs. Freyer, of Carol's, for a period of thirty days from January 18th to February 18th, 1966, seconded by Councilman Bury and carried. (M-11TUTE ORDER ''66-14) Appeal of H. E. Food Corporation (Ernest L. Waite) from denial by the Planning Com- mission of their application for a variance from Ordinance 1130 concerning the required number of parking spaces presented for consideration. Staff reported Planning Commission at their meeting of January 11th denied the application by a vo t.e of 41 to 3. Report of the Planning Commission was read and staff analysis in which it was stated there seemed to be no recourse to action to ,en in view of ordinance J.°equirementn on number of parking -spaces per number of seating capacity in restaurant but made certain recommendations for conditions should variance be fra.nted, i.e. 1) Architectural landscape and site plan approval by Architectural Committee; 2) Construction of neva curb, gutter and sidewalk; 3) Electric power service lead in be by underground conduit from street property line. City Manager stated since appeal had been made, he and Staff had met Uth representa- tives of the owners to discuss this problem. He ,stated in reviewing clans of interior adjustments, exits had been provided which reduced seating capacity from 192 to 174, and which automatically also reduced number of parking spaces required as these are based on seating capacity. He stated in view of the above, parking lot layout was revised to provide parking for 54 cars, which had been reviewed and approved by both Traffic Engineer and Police Chief. He stated on this basis, revised variance requested for only Li, parking spaces, and recommended variance be granted together with a revocable permit for landscaping on Lathrop Street to screen long; blank wall, in addition to construction of new curb, gutter and sidewalk if necessary, as City ?_,ngineer had indicated most: of sidewalk in -ood : hape .