Laserfiche WebLink
6.3. E. - Page 2 <br /> 3) The property at 520 Pine St. should be included in the district. PG&E has verified <br /> that the utility pole is in the district and the property does need to convert. <br /> 4) An error was made in the legal description. While the MUUD map shows parcel <br /> #10, the legal description did not include it. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> Council may choose to not approve the resolution. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> PG&E's portion will be funded by Rule 20A funds, and the other utilities will fund their <br /> respective undergrounding work. Currently, there is a budget of $300,000 in fiscal year <br /> 2013/14 Middlefield Road Utility Underground and Streetscape Project. Additional <br /> funds, if necessary, will be budgeted in the future once the design and estimated <br /> construction costs are further developed. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> This project is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA <br /> Sections 15302d Replacement or Reconstruction including undergrounding of overhead <br /> utilities. <br /> � <br /> CLAUDIA OLALLA, ASLA <br /> SENIOR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER <br /> � <br /> �'✓ ��-- <br /> BILL EKERN <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR <br /> �" <br /> ROBERT B. BELL <br /> CITY MANAGER <br /> ATTACHMENTS <br /> 1. Resolution <br /> 2. Revised MUUD Boundary Map <br /> 3. Close-up Map — Reason #1 <br /> 4. Close-up Map — Reason #2 <br /> 5. Close-up Map - Reason #3 <br /> 6. Legal Description <br />