Laserfiche WebLink
comments on the DEIR and res�onses to comments, that the Final EER adequately <br /> discusses all significant enviranmental issues, ar�d that the �inal EIR re#lects the <br /> independent judgment and analysis of the Pianning Commissian. The Planning <br /> Commission further certifies that it has re�iewed and considered the information in the <br /> Fina! EIR. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission finds that the information added in the Final <br /> EIR does not constitute signi�cant new information requiring recirculation of the DEIR, <br /> but rather that additional information clarifies or amplifies an adequate EIR. <br /> 5. The Planning Commission finds that c�rtain comments on the DEIR could <br /> be characterized as requests for additio�al mitigation measures. With respect to <br /> suggasted mitigation measures that w�re not added to the Final EIR, the Planning <br /> Commission recommends that the City Council adopt an� incorporate by reference the <br /> reasons set forth in the responses to comments contained in the Final EIR as its <br /> grounds for rejecting adoption of these mitigation measures. <br /> 6. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council certify th� <br /> Final EIR for the Project. <br /> 7. Pursuant to CEQA section 21081.8 and CEQA Guidelines section 15091, <br /> and in support of its a�pro�al of the Project, the Planning Commission has reviewed <br /> and consi�ered the CEQA Findings af �'act far the Proj�ct, attached hereto as Exhibit A <br /> and incorPorated hErein by reference, finds that such Findings of Fact are supported by <br /> substantial evidence in the record, and recommends that the City Council adopt the <br /> CEQA Findings of Fact. <br /> 8. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sectian 15126.6, the Planning Commission <br /> has rEViewed and considered the Finding Regarding Alternatives, attached hereto as <br /> Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, and recammends that the Ciiy Co�ncil <br /> adopt the attached findings that describe how only the Project would satisfy the Project <br /> Objectives and #hat none of the alternati�es has environmental advar�tages over the <br /> Project when balancir�g the Pro�ect Objectives. <br /> 9. Pursuant ta CEQA Guidelines section 15093, the Planning Commission <br /> has re�iewed and considered the Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC), <br /> attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorpara#ed herein by reference, and �ecommends <br /> that the City Cou�cil adopt the attached 50C that describes how th� merits of the <br /> project outweigh the significant una�oidable impacts identified that will result with <br /> implementation of the Praject. <br /> 1Q. Pursuant ta CEQA 5ection 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines section 15D91, <br /> and in support of its approval af the Project, the Plan�ing Commission has reviewed <br /> and considered the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program t#�at requires all <br /> mitigation measur�s described in the Final EIR be implemenked by means af Praject <br /> canditions, agreements, or otner measures, as set forth in the Mitigatio� Monitoring and <br /> Reporting P�ogram attached t�ereto as Exhibit D and incorporated h�rein by referertc�, <br /> ATTY/RE50.2898/PC RE50 RECOlVIMENDING STANFORD EIR CERTIFICATION <br /> REV:D$-15-13 VR <br /> Page 6 of 56 <br />