Agmt13 Environmental Science Associates

Browse Search

C r�kr: <�a� �� ?°a i. .`, 3 c,zy �r. � =�'r'A , C '., E.,.,. ta r t,a. , •r "+"... . . .'..,,u . ...&.2,.:� "�^� ..�7��1. .Cs.: ".�,'� ... � .. � �..�3'+,..: bv. f ; • Based on measures identified in the IHSP EIR,identi and discuss the adequacy of specific project-level measures proposed to handle contaminated soil and � ' groundwater,if present,and describe measures to reduce E the risk of exposure to workers onsite as well as potential ' vapor intrusion into Project. _ _ _._ _. __� 5.8 Hydrology and Water Quality Context To assess whether the Project would have project-level The IHSP EIR would have described impacts or contribute to any cumulative impact,ESA wilL• � the IHSP hydrology and water qualiiy ; . Discuss surface hydrology of the project site,identiiying � setting that would also apply to the significant drainage features and facilities,100 year flood Project,specifically information zone areas,local storm water collection infrastructure regarding surface hydrology(drainage c �Ning the area. patterns,features and faalities);the i change in the proportion of impervious * Describe and discuss areas of existin�groundwater surfaces and storm water runoff contamination relative to the project site. � volumes with implementation of the � . Evaluate the Project for storm water runoff,induding IHSP,and the possibility offlooding ; im ervious surface calculations,natural treatment � during 100-and 500-year storm events. approaches,and mitigation best management prac6ces. [ � • Discuss Project land uses with and potential effects to the � Bay and Redwood Creek. i • Summarize sea level rise baseline information and,as applicable from the IHSP or Project plans,potential adaptation measures relative to the project site. I � • Discuss the Project relative to restoration goals and policies � identified in the IHSP. � � As appropriate,identify project-level mitigation measures to � address hydrology and water quality effects,based on any ? program-level mitigation measures identified in IHSP EIR. _. _____ _ _.._.. _ __ _ 5.9 Land Use and Planning Context: To assess whether the Project would have project-level The IHSP EIR would have described ' impacts or contribute to any cumulative impact,ESA will: the IHSP land use setting that would ; . Discuss the proposed land use change that would occur aiso apply to the Project,sPeafically with the Project and relation to existing adjacent land uses ' information regarding existing and and the IHSP. � proposed land uses,potential land use conflicts,as well as land use ': * Discuss the ProjecYs consistency with IHSP and other applicable land use policies and applicable General Plan policies relevant to environmental development guidance. ; effects. _ _......... � ,, .._.... _ M�______. �.__.._� 5.10 Noise <�E.. Context: `To assess whether the Project would have project-level The IHSP EIR would have described � �mpacts or contribute to any cumulative impact,ESA will: �Assumptions: the IHSP noise setting that would also 3 . Describe the existing noise environment at the project site. � apply to the Project,specifically i • No new long-term or short- information regarding the existin� "' � Discuss the noise levels likely to be generated by the 3 term noise measurements noise environment existing sensitive ; construction equipment used to develop the Pro�ect. 3 will be taken. receptors within the IHSP area{based ` , Describe tential noise that ma result from tential on long-term and sho�t-term noise � P° y P° I measurements),existing noise- changes in the use and intensity of land use with the generating uses around the project Project. site,and potential short-term and long- '' . Calculate the change in nase levels due to baseline plus term noise effects that could result with : REV:06-15-15 VR Page 13 of 18 ATTY/AGR.Amend No. 21ESA Inner Harbor EIR Amendment No.2