Agmt13 Environmental Science Associates

Browse Search

Y * ��m� �! . R � Y : # �� ":_.� f�. � . .�,� �"''f . <. ' ' '' . �.. .r,. � �i 4 .� � . .... �� . �.. x �- '��, �� i '42 .,��>,>��-�.�.. �,...... a�. 'i ,�k,.,�. �'s ��.. �'��, '��, '�� > . ..�.��."��,`��.�E€�^,��' . implementation of the IHSP, tl Project and cumulative traffc along key regional and arterial ' roadway segments most affected by traffic around the ' ; project site.Use the noise prediction model of the Federal ' ' Highway Administration(FHWA)to determine whether there ' would be significant project or cumulative effects on noise ' ; levels along streets nearby where existing noise-sensitive ' ' land uses exist. ' � As appropnate,identiiy project-level mitigation measures to I address noise effects based on any program-level mit�gation measures identified in IHSP EIR. �� e � .. ...._ __ .�_� _ _ .....k � 5.11 Populatioo and Housing ` �M ��R�� Context: To assess whether the Project would have project-level The IHSP EIR would have described impacts or contribute to any cumulative impact,ESA will: ' the IHSP population and housing . Discuss the ProjecYs contribution to growth relative to setting information that would also regional and local projections of employment and new apply to the Project,specifically housing demand citywide and in the surrounding region. information regarding change in ' population in the IHSP area. ' • Assess employment,housing,and population impacts that The Project would not affect existing ' may be associated with the Project. housing. __ �.. . _ .�..� 5.12 Public Services ` Context: To assess whether the Project would have project-level , The IHSP EIR would have described impacts or contribute to any cumulative impact,ESA wilL ' the IHSP public services setting that I . Evaluate the potential for the Project to inaease public ' would also apply to the Project, service to the extent that existing service capacities or specifically information regarding thresholds would be exceeded. police protection,fire protection and public schools,and assessed ' • As appropriate,identify project-level mitigation measures to I agencies'ability to service address public services effects,based on any program-level ' development under the IHSP. ' mitigation measures identified in IHSP EIR. _ � � _ _ _ __ � . . � � � ��'��.�� ,��.,�r 3 5.13 Recreation and 0 en S aae Resources �„�, Context; To assess whether the Project would have project-level ; The IHSP EIR would have described , impacts or contribute to any cumulative impact,ESA will: ' the IHSP recreation setting that would ' . Discuss any recreation facilities or open space proposed by ', also apply to the Project,specifically ' the Project. information regarding existing local parks,recreation and open space areas � Assess the level of demand the Project would have on and per-capita rates,and how or existing recreatbnal and open space resources. whether development under the « Assess how any increased demand generated by Specific Plan would increase the use �pulation of the Project would affect existing local parks or degradation of those facilities. recxeation and open space areas,and per-capita acreage ' standards for reaeational facilities and other applicable ' policies in the General Plan and IHSP. ' • As appropriate,identify project-level mitiga6on measures to !. ' address recrea6onal effects,based on any program-level mitigation measures identified in IHSP EIR. _.. -_ . _�.. � 5.14 Transportation and Circulation � �`, ` ` � � ` �� . �° €'�� , " ' � � µ3 �� r.� �.,.. � �.� �....�� „�� ,� REV:06-15-15 VR Page 14 of 18 ATTY/AGR.Amend No. 2/ESA Inner Harbor EIR Amendment No. 2