Res13 15294 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements would constitute a signii►cant project include a total of one left-turn lane,one impact. through lane,and one right-turn lane. The northbound approach would need to be restriped to include a total of two northbound left-turn lanes and one shared through/right-turn lane. The eastbound and westbound approaches would need to be restriped to include a total of one left-turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane. With these improvements,the level of service(LOS)at this intersection would improve to an acceptable LOS C during both peak hours,and the impact would be less-than-signii►cant. Impact 7-5: Near Term Plus Project Mitigation 7-5. Implement Mitigation 7-1 Applicant to fully fund. City Prior to building Impact on Woodside Road/Broadway (the project applicant would be responsible Applicant or City to permit issuance that Intersection. Under Near Term Plus Project for fully funding/completing the mitigation). construct. would result in conditions during the PM peak hour,this With these improvements,the level of 608,999 total square intersection would continue to operate at LOS service(LOS)at this intersection would feet in Precise Plan F,and project traffic would cause the critical remain at LOS F. Although the LOS F Blocks A-E. Refer to delay to increase by 69.5 seconds. condition would exceed the City LOS Stanford Precise According to City of Redwood City guidelines, standard,the LOS under Near Term Plus Plan, Chapter IV, this change would constitute a signii►cant Project condition with this mitigation would Intersection project impact. be better than that under the Near Term Improvements Table. Without Project condition. These improvements would enhance the overall performance of the intersection. Therefore, with this mitigation,this project impact would be considered less-than-significant. However,because implementation of this mitigation would require Caltrans approval, the City cannot ensure its construction. Without implementation of the proposed mitigation,the impact would be signii►cant and unavoidable. Impact 7-6: Near Term Plus Project Mitigation 7-6. Implement Mitigation 7-2 Applicant to fully fund. City Prior to building Impact on Woodside Road/Bay Road (the project applicant would be responsible Applicant or City to permit issuance that Intersection. Under Near Term Plus Project for fully funding/completing the mitigation). construct. would result in conditions during the PM peak hour, project With these improvements,the level of 849,155 total square traffic would cause this intersection to service(LOS)at this intersection would feet in Precise Plan degrade from LOS D(44.9 seconds delay)to improve to an acceptable LOS D in the PM Blocks A-E. Refer to LOS F(91.1 seconds delay). According to peak hour,resulting in a less-than- Stanford Precise City guidelines,this change would constitute significantimpact. However, because Plan, Chapter IV, a signii►cant project impact. implementation of this mitigation would Intersection require Caltrans approval,the City cannot Improvements Table. ensure its construction. Without im lementation of the ro osed miti ation, Page 4 ' r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc RESO. 15294 MUFF#100