Res13 15294 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

EXHIBIT D 09/09/2013 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Implementation Monitoring and Timing Signature Date Pe1'fOrmanCe Crlterla Entity Verification Entity Requirements the impact would be signii►cant and unavoidable. Impact 7-7: Near Term Plus Project Mitigation 7-7. Implement Mitigation 7-3 Applicant to fully fund. City Prior to building Impact on Charter Street/Broadway (the project applicant would be responsible Applicant or City to permit issuance that Intersection. Under Near Term Plus Project for fully funding/completing the mitigation). construct. would result in conditions during the AM peak hour, project With these improvements,the level of 576,808 total square traffic would cause this intersection to service(LOS)at this intersection would feet in Precise Plan degrade from LOS C(24.7 seconds delay)to improve to an acceptable LOS B in the AM Blocks A-E. Refer to LOS F(127.7 seconds delay). In the PM peak hour and an acceptable LOS C in the Stanford Precise peak hour,the intersection would continue to PM peak hour,and the impact would be Plan, Chapter IV, operate at LOS F,and project traffic would less-than-signii►cant. Intersection cause the critical delay at the intersection to Improvements Table. increase by 104.6 seconds. In addition,the increase in peak hour volumes at this intersection would be large enough under both peak hours to satisfy the peak hour signal warrant. According to City guidelines, these changes would constitute a signii►cant ro"ectim act. Impact 7-8: Near Term Plus Project Mitigation 7-8(a). To mitigate the projecYs Applicant fair share or City Prior to building Impact on Charter Street/Bay Road impact at the intersection of Charter Street payment of Traffic permit issuance that Intersection. Under Near Term Plus Project and Bay Road,the intersection would need Impact Fee would result in conditions during the PM peak hour, project to be signalized with protected phasing on 1,370,785 total traffic would cause the intersection to the eastbound and westbound approaches square feet in degrade from LOS D(27.7 seconds delay)to on Bay Road,and permitted phasing on the Precise Plan Blocks LOS E(37.7 seconds delay). In addition,this northbound and southbound approaches A-E. Refer to intersection would have peak hour volume on Charter Street. In addition to Stanford Precise increases large enough under both peak signalization,the eastbound and Plan, Chapter IV, hours to satisfy the peak hour signal warrant. westbound approaches would need to be Intersection According to City guidelines,these changes restriped to include a total of one left-turn Improvements Table. would constitute a signii►cant project lane and one shared through/right-turn impact. lane. With these improvements,the level If,at the time this of service(LOS)at this intersection would improvement is improve to an acceptable LOS C in the AM required,the peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour. improvement has not Traffic from the proposed project would add yet been constructed 10.0 seconds to the PM peak hour delay at and the City this intersection over Near Term No Project determines that other conditions(see EIR Table 7.11);other Near development has not Term growth would add 14.5 seconds to yet significantly the delay over Existing conditions. contributed to the need for the Therefore, it is assumed that the proposed improvement,then project would contribute approximately 41 the applicant shall percent toward this impact. The proposed fully fund or construct project would mitigate its contribution to the improvement, this impact by contributing its fair share to a subject to potential Page 5 `� r 1106721FElRIMMRP Checklist(10672J.doc RESO. 15294 MUFF#100