My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-10-07 Closed and Regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-10-07 Closed and Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 5:12:48 PM
Creation date
10/3/2013 5:33:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/7/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
486
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.B. - Page 81 <br /> 4.16.2 Environmental Checklist and Discussion of Imnacts <br /> TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant Less Than <br /> Significant With Significant No Impact Beneficial Information <br /> Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Source(s) <br /> Incorporated <br /> Would the project: <br /> 1) Conflict with an applicable plan, � � � � � 1,2 <br /> ordinance or policy establishing <br /> measures of effectiveness for the <br /> performance of the circulation <br /> system,taking into account all modes <br /> of transportation including mass <br /> transit and non-motorized travel and <br /> relevant components of the <br /> circulation system,including but not <br /> limited to intersections, streets, <br /> highways and freeways,pedestrian <br /> and bicycle paths, and mass transit? <br /> 2) Conflict with an applicable � � � � � 1,2 <br /> congestion management program, <br /> including,but not limited to level of <br /> service standards and travel demand <br /> measures, or other standards <br /> established by the county congestion <br /> management agency for designated <br /> roads or highways? <br /> 3) Result in a change in air traffic � � � � � 1,2 <br /> patterns,including either an increase <br /> in traffic levels or a change in <br /> location that results in substantial <br /> safety risks? <br /> 4) Substantially increase hazards due to � � � � � 1,2 <br /> a design feature(e.g., sharp curves or <br /> dangerous intersections)or <br /> incompatible land uses(e.g., farm <br /> equipment)? <br /> 5) Result in inadequate emergency � � � � � 1,2 <br /> access? <br /> 6) Conflict with adopted policies,plans, � � � � � 1,2 <br /> or programs regarding public transit, <br /> bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or <br /> otherwise decrease the performance <br /> or safe of such facilities? <br /> 4.16.21 Transportation Impacts <br /> The current single-family residence generates appro�mately 10 daily traffic trips with one AM peak <br /> hour trip and one PM peak hour trip. The proposed residential development is estimated to generate <br /> 50 daily traffic trips with appro�mately four AM and five PM peak hour trips, a net increase of three <br /> AM trips and four PM trips.42 <br /> 42 Traffic generation rates are based upon estimates provided by Peter Delgado,Redwood City Associate Engineer. <br /> Rates are consistent with the Institute of Traffic Engineers(ITE),Trip Generation 8`h Edition.2008. <br /> 1410 Valota Road Residential Project 69 Initial Study <br /> Redwood City January 2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.