My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2013-10-07 Closed and Regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
AgdaPkt 2013-10-07 Closed and Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 5:12:48 PM
Creation date
10/3/2013 5:33:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/7/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
486
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.B. - Page 215 <br /> Commissioner Tabing asked about how the number of potential units was found. <br /> Mr. Lyon clarified how the zoning designation identifies the amount of unit per square <br /> foot. <br /> Commissioner Tabing noted there were a number of exceptions up for approval and <br /> asked how many units could be built without any variances. <br /> Mr. Lyon stated the code requires each individual lot to have frontage on a public <br /> roadway. He stated the Zoning Ordinance defines the front of the lot as the portion with <br /> the narrowest portion on a public street. He asked Ms. Littlefield if the analysis was <br /> done to find what the property would yield with no variances. <br /> Mrs. Littlefield replied no. <br /> Commissioner Holt asked about the number of potential units. She asked what could be <br /> built per the code with no variances. <br /> Mrs. Littlefield replied that the existing site constraints on the property take away from <br /> the maximum buildable potential. She stated to consider the project with no exceptions <br /> would be challenging because of the site constraints. <br /> Commissioner Holt asked if the eleven units would have to be an apartment building. <br /> Mr. Lyon replied that the type of building would not be a typical apartment complex. He <br /> stated the base number isn't necessarily what would be appropriate. <br /> Commissioner Holt asked if it is correct that the private roadway would not be gated. <br /> Mrs. Littlefield replied yes. <br /> Commissioner Holt asked if the Fire Department has been consulted in terms of access <br /> from the private roadway. <br /> Mrs. Littlefield stated that is part of the standard procedure, so the Fire Marshall met with <br /> the developer, reviewed the plans, and determined it would provide adequate access for <br /> emergency services. <br /> Commissioner Holt asked about runoff. <br /> Mrs. Littlefield stated the Engineering Department reviewed the storm water runoff plan <br /> to insure there would not be illicit discharges to the creek and determined it sufficient. <br /> Commissioner Holt asked about the development next door on Dillon Street. She asked <br /> if those were single-family residences. <br /> Mr. Lyon replied that they are single-family homes. <br /> Vice Chair Schmidt asked if the property is surrounded by culverts. <br /> Page 11 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.