My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso13 PC 13-24 2920 PC Reso-Adopt the Intitial Study MND - Undercrossing
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2013
>
Reso13 PC 13-24 2920 PC Reso-Adopt the Intitial Study MND - Undercrossing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2013 4:16:25 PM
Creation date
10/22/2013 4:11:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
10/15/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
?E nvironmental Analysis <br /> XVI.TRANSPORTATION AND Potentially Less 1];�.��Z � �-4'ti� �I��=,t'-� �t' � <br /> TRAFFIC --Would the project: Significant Significant Signi�icant Impact <br /> Impact with Impact <br /> Mitigation <br /> Incorporation <br /> a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ❑ ❑ ❑ � <br /> ordinance or policy establishing measures <br /> of effectiveness for the performance of <br /> the circulation systern,taking into account <br /> all modes of transportation including mass <br /> transit and non-motoxized travel and <br /> relevant components of the circulation <br /> system,incluciing bnt not litnited to <br /> intersecrions,streets,highways and <br /> freeways,pedestrian and bicpcle paths, and <br /> mass translt? <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable congesrion ❑ ❑ � � <br /> management program,including,but not <br /> limited to level of service standards and <br /> travel demand measures, or other <br /> standards established by the county <br /> congestion management agency for <br /> designated roads or highways? <br /> c} Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ❑ ❑ ❑ � <br /> including either an increase in traffic levels <br /> or a change in locarion that�esults in <br /> substantial safety risks? <br /> d) Substanrially increase hazards due to a ❑ � � ❑ <br /> design feature (e.g.,sharp curves or <br /> dangerous intersecrions} or incompatible <br /> uses {e.g., farm equipment}? <br /> e} Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ � <br /> � Conflict with adopted policaes,plans,or ❑ ❑ � � <br /> programs regaxding public transit,bicycle, <br /> or pedestrian faciliries,or otherwise <br /> decrease the performance or safety of such <br /> facilities? <br /> 2-61 US 1 D 1 Pedestriara Undercro.r.rarag and Brai� <br /> Island Koad Stor>n Draan Pumm�Stataon Projec•t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.