Agmt13 URS Corporation - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• Presence of trees and/or landscaping strip • Sidewalk presence/width • Adjacent land use • Grade This PBQOS analysis will quantify encountered or expected level of travel stress for up to 12 intersections and four corridors, and will be used in conjunction with performance targets identified in Task 2 to compare project alternatives and refine the project Complete Streets checklist. CONSULTANT will work closely with CITY staff to select the exact measurement methodology that best fits the project need and available data resources. Task 3.6-Traffic Operations Analysis Report(TOAR) The TOAR task assumes that a No Build and one (1) Project Alternative will be evaluated in the PA/ED. As described previously, CONSULTANT assumes that the construction year is 2020 and the design year is 2040. This scope includes the analysis of 12 existing local intersections— seven along Woodside Road/ Seaport Boulevard and five on Maple Street and Chestnut Street. The analysis will also include a new intersection created at Woodside Road and the northbound US 101 ramps with the elimination of the existing flyover. The FREQ model developed for the existing conditions will be used to determine changes that would occur at the US 101 mainline and ramps with the design alternatives. The freeway analysis will compare the operations of the no project and design alternatives for the AM and PM peak hours Subtask 3.6.I -Existing Conditions The traffic operations analysis report will incorporate the analyses documented in the existing conditions memorandum. This will include the freeway mainline and ramp analysis, arterial intersection analysis, isolated intersection analysis, intersection queuing, and crash data analysis (described in Task 3.2). Subtask 3.6 2- Construction Year Conditions CONSULTANT will include No Build and 2 preferred alternatives in the construction year analysis. CONSULTANT will analyze the AM and PM peak hour traffic construction year conditions for the 13 intersection study locations (12 existing and one new intersection). The measures of effectiveness evaluated for the isolated intersection will include average vehicle delay, level of services and queuing far the isolated intersections. For the intersections along the Woodside corridor, the measures of effectiveness drawn from the SimTraffic model for the AM and PM peak hours will include: average vehicle delay, level of service, percent of vehicles (demand) served, and vehicle queuing. Additional measures may be reported if requested by the PDT or Caltrans functional units. ATTY/AGR/2013.164/URS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGR REV:10-15-13 VR P,��e 29 of 78