My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt13 URS Corporation
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
Agmt13 URS Corporation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2016 5:25:52 PM
Creation date
10/23/2013 10:39:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
URS Corporation
PROJECT NAME
101/84 (Woodside Road) Interchange Project Approval & Environmental Document (PA&ED)
RMP File Number
304
Date
10/22/2013
MO Ref
13-184
Amendment
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
with the watershed, local hydrologic conditions, etc. will be documented for the study. FEMA <br /> Flood Insurance Rate Maps will be used as the basis of determining the impact of the proposed <br /> project on the floodplain. The potential changes in floodplain hydraulics due to new or additional <br /> overcrossing or ramp structures will be addressed in the floodplain evaluation. Based on the <br /> study, it is anticipated that measures, if needed, can be applied to minimize any changes in flood <br /> elevation or extent, compared to the no action alternative. Preparation of a more intensive <br /> Floodplain Evaluation Report, in the case where flood levels or changes are of concern, is not <br /> included in the scope of work. <br /> Task 4.7-Advanced Planning Study(Structures) <br /> CONSULTANT will prepare an Advance Planning Study (APS) for each of the proposed <br /> bridges and the non-standard retaining wall work. The bridge APS will be prepared in <br /> conformance with Caltrans Office of Special Funded Project(OSFP) Information and Procedures <br /> Guide Memo 3-2 and Caltrans Memos to Designers (MTD) 1-8, and will include Bridge General <br /> Plans, Construction Cost Estimates, and APS Checklists. It is expected that up to seven bridge <br /> APSs will be required. <br /> Non-standard retaining walls are anticipated to be utilized at up to four locations where room for <br /> construction is limited, bottom-up construction is desirable and/or settlement is an issue. <br /> CONSULTANT will also prepare up to one APS for the four retaining walls with the assumption <br /> that they are all Mechanically Stabilized Embankment (MSE) walls. MSE walls are relatively <br /> common, but Caltrans considers them non-standard walls requiring APSs. <br /> The work will also include providing support in preparation of the various environmental <br /> documents. A Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report described and prepared below in Task <br /> 4.8, will be included in the APS submittal package to Caltrans. <br /> Task 4.8-Preliminary Geotechnical Report <br /> Site visits will be performed and available data will be reviewed, including geotechnical data <br /> developed for the Project. Possible geotechnical/geologic impacts and mitigation measures will <br /> be discussed on a broad basis including but not limited to slope stability, geology, seismic <br /> impacts and risk, erosion, groundwater conditions, etc. for proposed bridge widenings, retaining <br /> walls, soundwalls, cuts and embankments. Generally, the geotechnical issues relevant to the <br /> project will be presented in a qualitative manner with no specific design recommendations. <br /> Potential mitigation measures will also be provided in a discussion format. All of this will be <br /> incorporated into a Preliminary Geotechnical Report. <br /> Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Reports (SPGR) will be prepared for each bridge, in <br /> accordance with Caltrans standards, to support the APS submittals. It is expected that up to <br /> seven SPGRs will be required. Typical fieldwork will consist of a brief site visit only. The <br /> SPGR will provide an overview of the existing foundations, site geology, seismicity, and, if <br /> possible, recommendations regarding suitable and unsuitable foundation types. If appropriate, <br /> the SPGR will also discuss the anticipated field and laboratory work required to support the <br /> future Preliminary Foundation Reports and the future Foundation Reports. <br /> ATTY/AGR/2013.164/URS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGR <br /> REV:10-15-13 VR <br /> Pa��33 of 78 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.