AgdaPkt 2013-11-18 Special - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8.A. - Page 58 vehicle spaces will be available to the general public (i.e., not only customers) after Crec&t Union and leasing office business hours. g. Implementation of the proposed project will not reguire on- or off-site improvements that would conflict with existing policies, plans, or programs that support alternafive transportafion. The project site is located a short c&stance from a regional rail station (Caltrain) and bus depot(SamTrans). In adc&tion, the proposed project will support both bike �d pedestrian usage consistent with the DTPP, incluc&ng secure bike parin�ng,public bike racks, and sidewalk improvements and landscaping. As a resul� the proposed project will not have an impact an altemative transportafion modes. Summary of Impacts Potentially Less than Signifcant Less than Significant With Mitigation Signifcant No Im act Incor orated Im act Im act XVIL UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS-- YVould the project: a) Exceed wastewater treahnent requirements of the applicable Regional Water X Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treahnent or X distribution facilities, or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Requue or result in the construction of a new storm water drainage facilities or X eapansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Result in the need for new or expanded water supply entitlements? X e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves the X project area that it does not have adequate capacity to serve the project area's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? � Be served by a landfill with insufficientpermitted capacity to accommodate X the projecYs solid waste disposal needs? g) Fail to comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to X solid waste? Documentation: a. The DTPP program EIR (p. 10-IS) concluded that the South Bayside System Authonty (SBSA, operator of the wastewater treabnent plant that serves Redwood City) 10-year capital improvement program, initiated in 2008, would ensure that the wastewater facility is able to continue to meet or exceed the wastewater treabnent reguirements established for it by the Regional YYater Quality Control Board(RYYQCB), even with the adc&tional wastewatergenerated by developmentpermitted under the DTPP. b. The DTPP program EIR (pp. 10-I S and 10-16) concluded that development occurring under the DTPP would not necessitate the construction or expansion of water or wastewater treabnentfacilifies. See items(d) and(e)below for further explanation. c. The DTPP program EIR (pp. 10-23 and 10-24) concluded that no significant increase in storm water runoff was anticipated to be created by the DTPP or DTPP facilitated development Purthermore, the project will be reguired to file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State YVater Resources Control Board under the Construcfion Acfivities Storm YVater General Permit (General Permit), which will ensure that construcfion activifies will not cause any increase in sec&mentafion, turbic&ty, or hazardous matenals concentrations within downstream receiving waters. The Engineenng Report for 525 Middlefield Road(Sanc&s, December 20, 2012, pp. 2 through Q and Appenc&ces P and G) details the localized on-site and adfacent drainage improvements and construcfion-penod reguirements (e.g., City of Redwood City Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program, Drainage Guidelines for Commercial Development)included in the projec� subject to City review and approval. d The City's Urban YYater ManagementPlan accounts for development occurring under the DTPP and concludes that adeguate water supply exists to serve such growth. Therefore, the DTPP program EIR (pp. 10-8 �d 10-9) concluded that the DTPP, and development facilitated by i� would have no impact on water supply. Purthermore, the DTPP program EIR (pp. 10-9 and 10-10) concluded that there would be no significant impacts resulfing from 23