My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1998-08-31
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
CC Min 1998-08-31
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:21:06 PM
Creation date
4/5/2004 11:55:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/31/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
■ ■ 1 1�' <br /> City Manager Everett stated that if the pazk is phased, the dirt azea will not <br /> be usable in winter; a wood chip azea would be usable. <br /> Mr. Chang circulated blueprints showing the staging azea, small dog area, and <br /> the lazge dog azea. A suggestion was made to hydroseed the small dog azea <br /> and put wood chips in the azea for large dogs. <br /> Council Member Bain expressed concern over the effect wood chips might <br /> have on the health of dogs and said he was not comfortable with any of the <br /> alternatives. He also questioned how much could be changed without <br /> rebidding the project . <br /> Mr. Chang stated that, in every varia6on in the report, the lower bidder stays <br /> the same, as do the second and third bidders. <br /> Turf would be maintained by the Shore Dogs, with water paid for by the City; <br /> if wood chips are used, the City would freshen up the azeas periodically. If <br /> wood chips are put down, top soil would not be put down. There was concern <br /> that if hydroseed is used geese using the azea as a feeding ground would be a <br /> problem. Another concern was the decision about this dog pazk impacting dog <br /> pazk#2. If a decision is made, it could be implemented in two to three weeks <br /> and the project would take 45-60 days. Council Member Ira suggested all <br /> funding come from the GID. <br /> M/S: Bain, Hartnett,to approve Option No. 2, awazding the contract total bid <br /> amount of$62,730.16 and increasing the project budget by $26,000 to cover <br /> the construction administration and additional construction contract costs. <br /> Council Member Hartnett supported the motion and felt it did not set a <br /> precedent for dog park #2. Funds for this dog pazk primarily come from GID <br /> 1-64. This pazk is good for the community. The commitment for maintenance <br /> is a substantial commitment. If the turf is not maintained, it will revert to <br /> wood chips. <br /> Council Member Claire agreed this was the best alternative. It is time for <br /> Redwood City to do the best it can do for its citizens. <br /> Council Member Ruskin supported the mo6on and emphasized it was <br /> important that this be done before winter. <br /> Council Member Ira recommended that all funds used be from the GID. <br /> City Attorney Schricker informed Council that action will be taken by <br /> resolution. The title is: <br /> "RESOLUTION NO. 13450 ACCEPTING BID FOR THE <br /> CONSTRUCT'ION OF REDWOOD SHORES DOG PARK, <br /> REJECTING ALL OTI-IER BIDS AND AUTHORIZING <br /> EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR SAID WORK; POMS <br /> LANDSCAPE CO:' <br /> COiJNCIL MINUT'ES Page No. 133 PAGE 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.