My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-02-10 Closed and Regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-02-10 Closed and Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2014 9:28:06 AM
Creation date
2/6/2014 4:03:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/10/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.2.D. - Page 13 <br /> draft WIP and presentation for the meeting with the Regional Water <br /> Board (Task 5). The desired outcome is to obtain approval of the draft <br /> Watershed Improvement Plan and presentation. <br /> Task 1 Deliverables: Project Administration Plan, Monthly Progress Reports, <br /> Meeting Agenda and Minutes <br /> TASK 2 — GATHER DATA, IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS <br /> 6 Gather Data <br /> Consultant shall gather available GIS and non-GIS data required for evaluating <br /> the watershed and selecting potential retrofit locations. Consultant shall interview <br /> the City and the other municipalities in the watershed to obtain the most recent <br /> applicable data that is available for the project, to request additional information if <br /> needed, set deadlines for the receipt of information, develop a preliminary list of <br /> retrofit sites for field verification based upon Agency input, and to identify each <br /> agency's vision for the project. <br /> • Identify LID Retrofit Potential Locations <br /> Consultant shall perform a GIS desktop analysis to identify parcels within the <br /> watershed for potential LID retrofit opportunities. The analysis will assess the <br /> feasibility (or suitability) of LID control measure implementation in the watershed. <br /> Consultant shall develop a list of site selection criteria which may include: <br /> ➢ Presence of adequate space for treatment. <br /> ➢ Accessibility for construction and operation and maintenance. <br /> ➢ Engineering issues (existing utilities, site hydraulics). <br /> ➢ Permitting issues (presence of sensitive environmental features). <br /> ➢ Other political factors (public visibility, municipality concerns, <br /> neighboring citizen concerns). <br /> The analysis shall consider the underlying landscape (e.g., soil type, slope, <br /> depth to groundwater, soil/groundwater contamination) and land use to rank <br /> sites based on their relative feasibility or practicality for implementation. In <br /> addition, opportunities for installing regional controls (i.e., facilities that treat <br /> drainage from multiple properties), potentially in combination with flood control <br /> basins or pump stations, shall be evaluated. The output will be a list of <br /> potentially feasible retrofit sites. <br /> Consultant shall evaluate the list of potentially feasible retrofit sites in terms of <br /> potential for reduction of contaminant loads and runoff volume for the area <br /> tributary to each potential retrofit location. The evaluation will be based on a <br /> hydrologic budget combined with land use-based pollutant loading. Consultant <br /> shall also evaluate locations where opportunistic retrofits could be implemented <br /> where, although the facilities could not be sized per the target design storm due <br /> REV:01-15-14 VR <br /> Page 11 of 16 <br /> ATTY/AGR.2014.008/Geosyntec Bayfront Watershed Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.