Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> under Staff Reports. He said the intent of the guidelines is to expedite requests of the <br /> public for stop signs. <br /> Traffic Engineer Haygood presented the staff report and reviewed the draft <br /> "Neighborhood Traffic Controls" document and the Speed Hump Use policy presented to <br /> Council at the December 8, 1997 Council meeting. He described the comments staff <br /> received ITom the Neighborhood Co-Chairs meeting. Engineer Haygood responded to <br /> previous concerns voiced by Council about speed humps in Fresno, California, and <br /> advised that they found "no significant liability problems with speed humps there." He <br /> said the City's guidelines should prevent problems of overuse and inappropriate locations <br /> that were experienced in Fresno. Traffic Engineer Haygood said staff recommended that <br /> when all criteria were met and construction plans were prepared, the request would be <br /> presented to Council for approval as a Consent Calendar item. <br /> Traffic Engineer Haygood described the proposed stop sign criteria, and said they were <br /> less restrictive for all-way stop signs than those currently defined by the warrants in the <br /> CalTrans traffic manual, which are the City's current engineering standards. He said the <br /> proposed criteria would only apply to local streets, minor collectors, in residential areas, <br /> and the traffic manual warrants would still be the engineering standard for all arterials, <br /> major collectors and non-residential streets. <br /> Traffic Consultant Dan Smith described in detail the criteria proposed for residential <br /> streets as outlined in the staff report. He explained that CalTrans warrants were designed <br /> for highways and major roadways, and were not responsive to the concerns and needs of <br /> residents of purely local residential streets. Mr. Smith described the petition process and <br /> the quantitative and compatibility criteria needed for a public request for a stop sign, <br /> including the volume of cars, number of accidents, school children crossing, speed at <br /> intersections, sight distances and other criteria adopted by the Council on a case-by-case <br /> basis such as nearby land uses and bicycle activity. <br /> In response to Council Member Bain's request for an update on the intersection of <br /> Redwood Shores Parkway and Marlin Drive, Traffic Engineer Haygood said it was being <br /> studied, and a recommendation, based on state guidelines not the local guidelines being <br /> presented tonight, would be presented to Council on March 16. In answer to further <br /> questions, Traffic Engineer Haygood described the petition process and criteria for speed <br /> humps, and the need to review an entire area to avoid just moving traffic ITom one street to <br /> another. He added that two-way stops were not covered by the proposed guidelines. <br /> City Manager Everett said he would have staff look at the streets near Jefferson and <br /> Valota as recommended by Council Member Bain. <br /> MEMO 2/24/98 <br /> Manager Patterson said staff was not out looking for places to put stop signs, "we have <br /> quite a few requests ITom the neighborhoods" right now. <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 FEBRUARY 23, 1998 <br /> MINUTES Page No. 292 PAGE 15 <br />