Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the Council should value the input of citizens, especially on such an important issue as <br />traffic and transportation, the number one concern in San Mateo County. <br />Mayor Howard said she agreed with Council Member Leipzig that community input was <br />extremely valuable and will help with traffic issues. She said, however, that there are no <br />active members on the committee at this time, and the City had hired a new Traffic <br />Engineer who had been handling traffic problems and concerns. Mayor Howard said the <br />previous T AC members highlighted the problems of the Committee - they were unsure of <br />the TAC's scope of work, what they were supposed to accomplish, and what were <br />Council's goals and objectives for the Committee. She recommended that the Council <br />dissolves this current committee, and after Council discussions and concurrence on exactly <br />what Council wants from a citizens traffic committee, then the Council could recruit. She <br />said it was unfair to future members if the Council was unclear or unsure about what was <br />expected of them, and to go forward with the same situation would be setting everyone up <br />for another failure. Mayor Howard recommended that this topic be a subject of future <br />study sessions to be held with boards, committees and commissions. <br /> MEMO 3/17/98 <br />Council Member Ira agreed that the Council would not want to appoint new members to <br />the T AC under the old parameters. He asked if, procedurally, it would be easier to <br />dissolve the TAC or just freeze the membership until the Council could decide on what it <br />truly wanted from such a citizens group. <br />City Attorney Schricker said a new committee could be established easily at any time. <br />He provided background on the troubled TAC and said it would probably be easier to start <br />over after the Council had formulated a specific scope of work. He said starting fresh <br />would give the Council more freedom to establish goals and policies. City Attorney <br />Schricker said, "I know from having drafted this in the past, it has been very difficult to <br />weave our way through the staff authority that exists under City Code provisions." <br />Council Member Hartnett said his motion would put the Council in a position to define <br />an understandable and workable mission for such a committee. He said it was important to <br />avoid the same situation that has plagued the committee from its inception ten years ago. <br />Council Member Hartnett said it had been a difficult experience for the members, the staff <br />and the community as well, and the problems could not be solved piecemeal. He said the <br />people who serve on the committee should feel secure that they are making a difference, <br />and the Council needs time to work that out. <br />Council Member Bain said that this Committee should be considered in context with all <br />the other Council appointed boards, committees and commissions. He said he saw no <br />harm in placing the Committee on hold pending a study session where the Council could <br />hear from the public. Council Member Bain described how the Housing and Human <br />Concerns Committee resolved the problems they were experiencing by having the Council <br />study the issue and making substantial changes in its scope of work, recruitment and <br />terms. He suggested the Council do the same for the T AC. <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK NO. 56 MARCH 16, 1998 <br />MINUTES Page No. 330 PAGE 12 <br />