My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-03-24 Closed and Regular
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-03-24 Closed and Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2015 4:19:04 PM
Creation date
3/20/2014 6:17:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/24/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
557
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIG F 8.A. - Page 167 <br /> City of Redwood City Revised Elm Auaenaurn <br /> January 22, 2014 Page 1-8 <br /> Upon certification of the 2003 EIR, however, the City Council determined that some of the <br /> transportation and circulation mitigation measures, while technically feasible, were cost- <br /> prohibitive and would require extensive coordination with State agencies. The City Council, <br /> therefore, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with three additional significant <br /> unavoidable impacts, for a project total of 28 significant unavoidable impacts. <br /> This revised Addendum concludes that, because the current Pete's Harbor project is <br /> substantially reduced from the Pete's Harbor portion of the 2003 project (e.g., 222 fewer <br /> residential units, maximum building height reduced from 240 feet [five buildings] to 75 feet [one <br /> building]), the reduced-scale Pete's Harbor project would result in a total of one significant <br /> unavoidable impact, which would be a cumulative traffic impact at El Camino Real/Whipple <br /> Avenue. <br /> Consistent with Section 15162(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, this significant unavoidable impact <br /> identified in this revised Addendum is not a new or more severe impact than that identified in the <br /> 2003 EIR. <br /> T.110695 Pete's Harbor EIR Addendumlrevised addendum no 211(10695-01).doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.