AgdaPkt 2014-03-24 Closed and Regular

Browse Search

B.A. - Page 276 Pete's Harbor uriy a rceuwoou iiy Revised EIR Addendum January 22, 2014 Page 3-35 mitigation identified in the 2003 EIR for Impact 7-17 remains applicable to the current Pete's Harbor project and remains sufficient to reduce this impact to a less-than-significant level. The language has been modified to note that the applicant would make a fair-share contribution to the funding of this mitigation. Impacts 7-18 through 7-27 Analysis: Other Cumulative Impacts. The 2003 EIR also identified significant impacts resulting from Cumulative With Project traffic on the following roadway facilities: • Alameda de las Pulgas/Woodside Road intersection (Impact 7-18); • Broadway/Woodside Road/U.S. 101 Southbound Off-Ramp--PM peak hour (Impact 7-19); • Veterans Boulevard/Woodside Road intersection--PM peak hour (Impact 7-20); • Blomquist Street/Seaport Boulevard intersection (Impact 7-21); • U.S. 101 southbound mixed-flow lanes, Whipple Avenue to Woodside Road segment--AM peak hour (Impact 7-22); • U.S. 101 southbound mixed-flow lanes, Woodside Road to Marsh Road segment--AM peak hour (Impact 7-23); • Westbound SR 84, County line to University Avenue and University Avenue to Willow Road segments--AM peak hour (Impact 7-24); • U.S. 101 southbound mixed-flow lanes, SR 92 to Whipple Avenue segment--PM peak hour (Impact 7-25); • U.S. 101 southbound mixed-flow lanes, Whipple Avenue to Woodside Road and Woodside Road to Marsh Road segments--PM peak hour (Impact 7-26); and • Eastbound SR 84, Willow Road to University Avenue and University Avenue to the County line segments--PM peak hour (Impact 7-27). The associated 2003 EIR mitigations described a combination of roadway improvements plus implementation of a project-specific Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program. Due to the need for freeway widening to mitigate several of the impacts (Impacts 7-22 through 7-27), full mitigation to less-than-significant levels was considered infeasible for implementation by a single development project, and these particular impacts were therefore identified as significant and unavoidable. Impact 7-19 was also identified as significant and unavoidable because right- of-way constraints made the mitigation infeasible. The 2003 EIR found that the remaining Impacts 7-18, 7-20, and 7-21 could be reduced to less-than-significant levels with implementation of identified roadway modifications. The current Pete's Harbor project in combination with One Marina (the two properties that constituted the original Marina Shores Village project) would not result in any of the significant Cumulative With Project impacts identified above (Impacts 7-18 through 7-27). All of the identified impacts would be less-than-significant. T.110695 Pete's Harbor EIR Addendumlrevised addendum no 213(10695-01).doc