My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Minutes 1954
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1954
>
Minutes 1954
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2014 4:52:43 PM
Creation date
4/8/2014 4:52:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/4/1954
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
13� <br /> in having the opportunity of working with the City Council. <br /> REPORT - WATER LINE, BAYSHORE BOULEVARD. Mayor Herkner stated the committee had not been able <br /> to contact the partiea concerned as yet. Agenda August 30th. <br /> REPORT - STREET LIGHT�, EL CAMINO .REAL. City Manager submitted a written report, copy to each <br /> Cou.ncilman covering studies by himself, City Engineer Jain and the P.G.&E. The latter re- <br /> �•• commended increasing all existing lights on E1 Camino Real to 10,000 lumens, and in addition, <br /> � twelve additional 10,000 lumen lights north of Whipple and five additional 10�000 lumen <br /> lig�its on the west side of El C a�ino between Brewster and Whipple at a total increase in <br /> coat per year of �3,180.60. It developed that. seven existing 2,500 lumen lights on El <br /> Camino Real on the east side between Charter Street and Berkshire Avenue have been billed <br /> �.-- <br /> to the City and the Menlo Lighting District has not reimbursed t he City for this expense. <br /> � . <br /> County Engineer Grant will reco�rnnend to the Board of Supervisors, that the City be reimbursed <br /> for the sxpense of main�aining six of these lights, however, he feels that should the City <br /> desire lar�er lamps installed, they should bear the additional cost of such installation. <br /> Councilman Granger stated his opinion that the Council Lighting Committee should be called <br /> in on this discussion. He stated that the budget contained funds nearly sufficient to <br /> increase lighting on E1 Camino to 10,000 lumens throughout the entire city and the addition <br /> of a small amount would take care of the expense for the �ear. He stated further that <br /> practically all cities on the peninsula used 10,000 lumen lamps or greater, and he favors <br /> lighting up the city to compare favorably with other cities on the peninsula. Councilman <br /> Granger approved of the report with the exception of the last paragraph in which 10,000ts <br /> were recortunended for intersections and 6,OOO� s for intermediate lightin�. Matter was <br /> � finally referred to, the Council Street Lighting Comrnittee for further consideration and <br /> '�� report at the August 23rd meeting. <br /> REPORT ON CITY DUMP OPERATION. City Manager Rolison made a report of available land, operation <br /> of durnps by the City of San Mateo and the resultant cost, estimated cost of erec�ing fence <br /> along Harbor Boulevard, etc. He stated that Fire Chief Lodi was on vacation and a meeting <br /> of the full committee would be held upon his return. Agenda August 23rd. <br /> REPORT ON BID OPENING, Improvement of Alameda de las Pulgas, Roosevelt Avenue to Goodwin Avenue, <br /> Gas Tax Tai.C .S. Project 53. Following bids were received: <br /> 0. C. Jones & Sons, Berkeley _ �11,�.24.30 <br /> Geo. C. Renz Construction Company, Santa Clara 11,981.28 <br /> City Engineer Jain recommended acceptance of 0. C. Jones bid which recommendation concurred <br /> in by City Manager. Councilman Stout moved approval, seconded by Councilman Jones and <br /> carried. <br /> � <br /> DOG LEASH ORL'INANCE. Councilma.n Jones called attention to this ordinance which is now in effect. <br /> � He thought the public should be informed in some way of this ordinance, and in addition to <br /> the newspaper, it was suggested that a postcard be mailed to every dog owner. After further <br /> discussion regarding the enforcement of this ordinance and the fact that licenses are issued <br /> �"' by the County, and the enforcement is up to the County Pound man, City Manager was requested <br /> �r to look into the matter �.nd ascertain whether or not names of dog owners could be secured <br /> from the County. A Ntr. Tessendorff addressed the Council re�arding dogs in public parks, <br /> and a letter from Mrs. E. C. Meyer, 2433 Carson Street commending the Council for takin� <br /> the action in adopting leash ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.